In recent years, many writers have come to rely on AI writing tools like ShortlyAI to jumpstart creative storytelling, generate compelling content, and maintain productivity in fast-paced environments. However, users of ShortlyAI began encountering a frustrating issue over time: stories would sometimes be inexplicably cut off mid-sentence, with the application displaying a terse and unfriendly error message— “Unexpected EOF token.” This not only interrupted the writing process but left many users puzzled and concerned about data loss and reliability.
TL;DR
The “Unexpected EOF token” error in ShortlyAI was caused primarily by limitations in how large documents were processed and chunked for analysis and generation. The AI model would often reach the end of a chunk without a clear continuation, causing truncated outputs. To resolve this, tools like ShortlyAI adopted a more thoughtful document chunking workflow that maintained narrative flow across segments. Understanding how these systems manage context can help users write smarter and minimize disruptions in future use.
Understanding “Unexpected EOF Token”
The “Unexpected EOF token” error is a technical message with roots in computer programming. “EOF” stands for “End Of File,” a marker that tells a system it has reached the end of a file or data stream. In the context of ShortlyAI, it indicated that the AI engine had unexpectedly run out of textual data or encountered an improperly ended document segment while processing input.
But this was not necessarily a bug in the classical sense. Rather, it was a reflection of the AI’s internal mechanism for dividing long pieces of text into digestible units for its language model to interpret. When these segments—or “chunks”—weren’t properly closed, aligned with sentence boundaries, or passed between prompts correctly, the system would throw this error.
What Caused the Truncation of Stories?
There were several intersecting causes for these abrupt story truncations:
- Token Limits: Language models work with tokens—small units of meaning, usually words or parts of words. ShortlyAI used OpenAI’s GPT models, which had strict token limits (e.g., 2048 or 4096 tokens depending on the version).
- Improper Chunking: When parsing a user’s input, if the system split the narrative into chunks without regard for sentence or paragraph boundaries, transitions between chunks could be lost, confusing the model and causing it to stop abruptly.
- Prompt Mismanagement: Occasionally, the AI would be handed incomplete prompts or pieces of text that lacked sufficient context or cues to know how or where to continue the story.
Taken together, these issues conspired to make some story outputs unreliable, especially during longer writing sessions where continuity is crucial.

The Document Chunking Workflow: A Deeper Look
To address the truncation problem, ShortlyAI (backed by OpenAI) deployed an improved document chunking workflow. This strategy involved more intelligent parsing of user input and output based on linguistic natural boundaries. It was designed to keep the AI “in the zone” by preserving context and narrative continuity across AI generations.
Step-by-Step Breakdown of the Workflow
- Natural Boundary Detectors: Algorithms were implemented to identify sentence and paragraph breaks rather than chopping content arbitrarily. This meant that story elements like dialogue or transitions wouldn’t be cut off mid-stream.
- Context Preservation Buffers: Before handing off a new chunk of text to the model, the system would include a portion of the preceding chunk (often the last 200–300 tokens) to act as a memory buffer. This better anchored the AI’s understanding of “what came before.”
- Chunk Overlap Logic: Adjacent text segments were made to overlap slightly, ensuring that no critical narrative elements or build-up were lost between transitions.
This new document chunking workflow allowed ShortlyAI to mitigate the limitations of token-based processing. Rather than working blind from disjointed segments, the AI model now engaged with information that smoothly connected from one chunk to the next.
Why Narrative Flow Matters in AI Writing
In fiction writing—especially for genres like fantasy, sci-fi, or thrillers—maintaining narrative flow is vital. Characters develop subtly over pages, plot arcs progress in stages, and emotional beats require careful pacing. The introduction of document chunking was especially crucial for:
- Maintaining Character Continuity: Preventing “amnesia” where the AI forgets a character’s traits or past actions between generations.
- Preserving Tone and Style: Ensuring the AI didn’t shift tone mid-chapter or revert to generic text due to loss of context.
- Completing Long Scenes: Enabling the AI to finish complex ideas or scenes that couldn’t fit into a single token-bounded generation.
This is why writers who heavily used ShortlyAI began to notice smoother transitions, fewer dropped threads, and a significant reduction in the “Unexpected EOF token” error as these improvements were rolled out.
Best Practices to Avoid Truncation in AI Writing
While system-side improvements have greatly minimized error frequency, users can still apply several strategies to help maintain smooth AI story generation:
- Write in Segments: Instead of writing a 10,000-word story in one unbroken file, split it into chapters or sections.
- Use Recap Prompts: Periodically remind the AI what has happened so far, especially if introducing new chapters or settings.
- Avoid Incomplete Sentences Before Generation: Leaving a sentence half-finished right before prompting the AI can confuse the algorithm and lead to dropped outputs.
- Format Consistently: Structured formatting, such as using line breaks between paragraphs, helps the system identify boundaries naturally.
The Broader Implication for AI Writing Assistants
The struggles ShortlyAI faced and eventually mitigated with improved chunking workflows offer a case study in the challenges of working with generative AI models constrained by token limits and context windows. As language models evolve—GPT-4 and beyond—these token ceilings expand, but they are unlikely to vanish completely due to computational limits and economic factors.
Therefore, intelligent chunking, summary injection, context management, and overlapped content design will continue to be key innovations in AI-assisted writing platforms. These approaches allow machines to process content more humanely—treating ideas in threads and flows instead of cold data packets.
Closing Thoughts
The “Unexpected EOF token” error was more than a technical hiccup—it underlined the gap between how humans express themselves and how machines understand commands. ShortlyAI’s revision of its chunking architecture signaled a pivot toward greater narrative fidelity and user confidence. While no system is flawless, the advances in maintaining narrative flow now point toward a much more promising horizon for long-form AI-generated content.
Writers using AI can rest a little easier today, knowing that the tools available are better equipped to respect the delicate architecture of storytelling—from beginning to end.

